Water Science & TechnologyWST Vol 58 No 4 pp 757763 © IWA Publishing 2008 doi:10.2166/wst.2008.439
Escherichia coli in household drinking water and diarrheal disease risk: evidence from Cambodia
J. M. Brown, S. Proum and M. D. Sobsey
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Box 870229, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0229, USA E-mail: email@example.com
Department of Chemistry, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, CB 7431 Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA E-mail: email@example.com
Escherichia coli counts in household drinking water may or may not reliably indicate the presence of diarrheogenic pathogens originating in feces. The extent to which a bacterial indicator like E. coli predicts risks from all classes of pathogens (viruses and parasites as well as bacteria), especially in tropical waters, is uncertain. To investigate the association between E. coli in household drinking water and diarrheal diseases in Cambodia, we conducted a 22 week cohort study in a rural village in Kandal Province. Episodes of diarrhea (all) and bloody diarrhea (dysentery), water quality, water sources, and other covariates were monitored biweekly in 180 households. Households used a variety of water treatment, storage, and handling practices.
Results suggest a weak but positive association between E. coli counts in household drinking water and diarrhea and for diarrhea with blood (dysentery), after adjusting for clustering within households and within individuals over time. Compared to households with <1 E. coli/100 ml in drinking water, there was no observed increased risk for having 110 E. coli/100 ml (LPR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.811.2 for diarrheal disease; LPR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.361.6 for dysentery). Households with measured E. coli of 11100/100 ml did report increased diarrhea (LPR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.11.3 for diarrheal disease; LPR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.01.8 for dysentery), as did those with 1011,000 E. coli/100 ml (LPR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.21.3 for diarrheal disease; LPR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.01.4 for dysentery) and those with >1,000 E. coli per 100 ml sample (LPR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.11.2 for diarrheal disease; LPR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.01.3 for dysentery). Unlike the results of some previous studies, diarrheal disease risks did not increase progressively in magnitude with increasing concentration of E. coli in drinking water.
Keywords: Cambodia; diarrhea; drinking water; E. coli
Full article (PDF Format)
eProduct: Buy this article for £24.00 (IWA MEMBER PRICE: £18.00)
All prices include VAT. For customers where VAT should not be applied, the VAT amount will be removed upon payment