IWA Publishing
 IWA Publishing Journals   Subscriptions   Authors   Users   Librarians   FAQs 

Water Supply Vol 2 No 4 pp 89–96 © IWA Publishing 2002

Substrate turnover at low carbon concentrations in a model drinking water distribution system

R. Boe-Hansen*, H.-J. Albrechtsen**, E. Arvin*** and C. Jørgensen****

*Environment and Resources DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Bygning 115, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark (Website: http://www.er.dtu.dk). DHI - Water and Environment, Agern allé 11, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark (Website: http://www.dhi.dk)
**Environment and Resources DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Bygning 115, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark (Website: http://www.er.dtu.dk)
***Environment and Resources DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Bygning 115, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark (Website: http://www.er.dtu.dk)
****DHI - Water and Environment, Agern allé 11, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark (Website: http://www.dhi.dk)


ABSTRACT
Water quality changes caused by microbial activity in the distribution network can cause serious problems. Reducing the amount of microbial available substrate may be an effective way to control bacterial aftergrowth. The purpose of the present study was to study the kinetics of substrate utilisation and bacterial growth at low nutrient conditions in a model distribution system. The model system consisted of two loops in series, where flow rate and retention time were controlled independently. Spiking the drinking water of the model system with two different environmentally realistic concentrations of carbon allowed for a close monitoring of the kinetics of substrate turnover (less than 10 mg C/L 14C-benzoic acid was added). The mineralisation of benzoic acid was rapid and could be modelled by a no-growth Monod expression using a maximum degradation rate of 0.59 mg C/L/h and a half-saturation constant of 2.6 mg C/L. Only 2-4% of the carbon being degraded was incorporated into the biofilm. The results from our study suggest that the cell-specific respiration of biofilm was much higher than for suspended bacteria, and that the growth rate of the bulk phase bacteria was approximately 10 times higher than the biofilm bacteria.

Full article (PDF Format)


PAY-PER-VIEW: Buy this article for £20.00 (IWA MEMBER PRICE: £15.00)
Checkout