| IWA Publishing Journals | | | Subscriptions | | | Authors | | | Users | | | Librarians | | | FAQs |
 |
Water Supply Vol 2 No 2 pp 59–67 © IWA Publishing 2002 In the (adsorption) competition between NOM and MIB, who is the winner, and why?G. Newcombe*, J. Morrison**, C. Hepplewhite*** and D.R.U. Knappe*****Australian Water Quality Centre, a partner in the CRC for Water Quality and Treatment, Private Mail Bag, Salisbury, SA 5108, Australia
ABSTRACT The adsorption of an odour compound common in drinking water, 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), was studied on four activated carbons in the presence of six well characterised natural organic matter (NOM) solutions. It was found that, although the carbons and the NOM solutions had a wide range of characteristics, the major competitive mechanism was the same in all cases. The low molecular weight NOM compounds were the most competitive, participating in a direct competition with the MIB molecule for adsorption sites. Equivalent background concentration (EBC) calculations indicated a relatively low concentration of directly competing compounds in the NOM. Some evidence of pore blockage, and or restriction was also seen, with microporous carbons most affected by low molecular weight NOM, and mesoporous carbons impacted by the higher molecular weight compounds. eProduct: Buy this article for £24.00 (IWA MEMBER PRICE: £18.00) All prices include VAT. For customers where VAT should not be applied, the VAT amount will be removed upon payment |
|
 |
